Subject	SCC Dyno Comparison numbers >>
Posted by	stockplayerz (NYC) on July 14, 2004 at 12:59 PM
	This message has been viewed 222 times.
Message	Interesting FYI if you haven't seen it already. Check out how much of a variation there was between different dynos. The test was done on a Ford Ranger 4.0 (2WD). 132HP/169TQ Dyno Dynamics (Vishnu Performance) 148HP/175TQ Maha (AMS) 160HP/187TQ Dynamic Test Systems (XS Engineering) 165HP/199TQ Dynojet (Sport Compact Car) 167HP/199TQ Dynojet (K&N) 173HP/195TQ Dynapack (Apex'i) 174HP/205TQ Dynojet (HKS) Even though it is impossible to replicate EXACT conditions, they did try to make the test as consistant as possible. Since turbocharged cars are more prone to power fluctuations with temperature, a very basic normally aspirated car was used for the test. Even with the slight variation of conditions, i'm surprised to see a difference of 42HP and 36TQ from the low to the high. Just found it interesting and wanted to share... mike zxredline@yahoo.com
Follow Ups	SCC Dyno Comparison numbers >> - stockplayerz (NYC) 12:59:09 07/14/04 Thanks, but keep in mind; - ni[X]it 13:08:29 07/14/04 A+++ Post! Highly recommended! Would read his posts again! (n/m) - Tu 13:30:04 07/14/04 Yeah, I don't care for dyno #'s. >> - Arnel(Z32racing.com) 14:07:42 07/14/04 Not necissarily.... - fantomZ(OH) 14:20:26 07/14/04 No, ZHound defintely owns him. (n/m) - Scotts94z32 14:38:51 07/14/04 Haha, I wasn't contesting that :) (n/m) - fantomZ(OH) 14:53:47 07/14/04 Re: Yeah, I don't care for dyno #'s. >> - ZHOUND 16:28:21 07/14/04 When you heading back to Fontucky? (n/m) - Z1TRUTH 21:30:34 07/14/04 Don't know yet. :-\ (n/m) - ZHOUND 11:59:57 07/15/04 cool info, thanks... it'd be interested to see the ambient - Scotts94z32 14:09:13 07/14/04
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.